“Children of Rage”: The Strange Case of RAD Victim Beth Thomas and Her Re-Birthing Benefactor Connell Watkins
compiled by Patrick H. Moore
Beth Thomas was the angry little girl featured on the remarkable, albeit disturbing, HBO documentary, Child of Rage, which was released around 1990. She suffered from severe Reactive Attachment Disorder.
In an excellent blog post by marilyn4ever, posted on October 30, 2010, Marilyn details Beth Thomas’s story with empathy and apparent clarity. I strongly suggest you read Beth’s post and a second post critiquing a controversial treatment program for RAD called Attachment Therapy, as well as Marilyn’s follow-up post on Attachment Therapy called Beth Thomas, Candace Newmaker and Attachment Therapy Controversy.
(Disclaimer: This information is entirely new to me and I have no informed opinion as to Beth Thomas’s mental health (or lack thereof today) or the pros and cons of Attachment Therapy. I do think the Beth Thomas story and this general topic is quite fascinating and strongly recommend that anyone interested click on the provided links to learn more.)
Part One:
Here is a quick sketch of Ms. Thomas’s early childhood and alleged recovery:
Beth’s mother died when she was one year old. She and her infant brother Jonathan were left in the care of their sadistic father, who sexually abused her to an appalling degree. Beth and Jonathan were rescued by Child Services when she was 19 months old. By this point, she was horribly scarred. Beth and Jonathan were adopted by Tim and Julie, sincere church people, who had no biological children. Shockingly, Tim and Julie were told nothing about the children’s abusive background.
It wasn’t long until Tim and Julie discovered the horrible truth about Beth and Jonathan’s upbringing. Beth had recurring nightmares about a “man who was falling on her and hurting her with a part of himself.” Beth masturbated several times a day until she bled and had to be hospitalized. She also poked pins into her brother. After some time had passed, she smashed her brother’s head into the cement floor which required stitches. As Beth admits in Child of Rage in her soft, rather affect-less voice, her desire is to kill her brother. She also wants to kill her adoptive parents. Although Beth is perfectly intelligent and is well aware that her actions are wrong, she experiences no remorse. Based on the mounting danger that Beth is going to kill Jonathan, in early 1989, her parents took her to a therapist named Connell Watkins, who diagnosed Beth with a severe case of Reactive Attachment Disorder and began a course of intensive behaviour modification.
Based on the treatment plan, at first, all of her freedom was radically restricted. She was locked in her bedroom at night so she couldn’t escape or hurt anyone. Beth began to improve and the restrictions were slowly removed. Within one year, she was so much better that she was permitted to share a bedroom with the therapist’s own daughter. Measured by any yardstick, it was remarkable. She learned empathy and remorse and regretted her own cruelties and would weep openly when describing some of the bad things she had done, especially to her brother Jonathan.
Marilyn reports (and I believe many would agree) that Beth Thomas grew into a mentally healthy woman. She studied nursing, earned a degree, and has authored a book entitled “More Than a Thread of Hope.” She and her second adoptive mother, Nancy Thomas, established a clinic for children with severe behaviour disturbances. Nancy Thomas has written a book entitled Dandelion on my Pillow, Butcher Knife Beneath (Coping with Personal Problems). Their website is www.attachment.org.
Part Two:
Connell Watkins and the Death of Candace Newmaker
Although Connell Watkins arguably has done an amazing job of helping Beth Thomas recover from her intense abuse through a regimen consisting largely of strict rules and the gradual earning of privileges, by the time Candace Newmaker’s adoptive parents brought their troubled child to Ms. Watkins for therapy, Watkins had begun using far more controversial techniques including something called “rebirthing”.
The script for that fateful day called for Candace to be “wrapped in a flannel sheet to simulate a womb”. She was then told to extricate herself from the womb, the expectation being that the process “would help her “attach” to her adoptive mother.” What was peculiar about this was the fact that as Candace sought to “extricate herself”, four adults including Connell Watkins “used their hands, feet, and large pillows to resist her attempts to free herself”. It was all videotaped and the evidence shown at trial shows Candace screaming for help and air. Candace repeatedly stated “she was dying, to which Waktins co-therapist Julie Ponder responded, “You want to die? OK, then die. Go ahead, die right now”. At some point, Candace vomited and fouled herself inside the sheet. Her “therapists” still would not let her go.
Some 40 minutes into the session, Candace’s adoptive mother, Jeane Newmaker, asked her: “Baby, do you want to be born?” Candace faintly said “no”. This was the last word she ever uttered.
Julie Ponder responded in frustration, “Quitter, quitter, quitter, quitter! Quit, quit, quit, quit. She’s a quitter!”
Adoptive mother,Jeane Newmaker, felt rejected by Candace’s inability to be reborn and was asked “to leave the room, in order that Candace would not “pick up on (Jeane’s) sorrow”. Ultimately, only Watkins and Ponder were left in the room with Candace. When they finally unwrapped her from the sheet, “she was motionless, blue on the fingertips and lips, and not breathing.” Paramedics were called and were able to restore the girl’s pulse. She was helicoptered to a Denver hospital and declared brain-dead the next day, as a result of asphixia.
At trial, Watkins and Ponder were convicted of reckless child abuse resulting in death. They were each sentenced to 16 years in prison. Jeanne Newmaker pleaded guilty to neglect and abuse charges and got a four-year suspended sentence. Her charges were later expunged from her record. Watkins was paroled in June 2008 after serving 7 years, and placed under “intense supervision” with restrictions on contact with children or counseling work.
* * * * *
Although I stated at the beginning of this post, that I would not state an opinion on the pros and cons of attachment therapy, after reading about Candace Newmaker’s tragic demise, it’s hard not to. Please keep in mind that Nancy Thomas is Beth Thomas’s second adoptive mother, having replaced the church people, Tim and Julie, sometime after Beth’s recovery.
Marilyn writes in her blogpost, Beth Thomas, Candace Newmaker and Attachment Therapy Controversy:
It is Nancy Thomas’s association with Watkins and Ponder that I find worrisome in her work with Beth (Thomas). Nancy worked with Watkins and Ponder during the Newmaker murder. (It’s not clear what Nancy Thomas did during the death of Candace Newmaker. I see no evidence she was in the room at that time and she certainly was not charged with anything.)
Marilyn points out that Thomas owns two clinics “Families by Design” and “Stop America’s Violent Youth“. As an advocate and practitioner of Attachment Therapy (AT), she allegedly engages in techniques that include “screaming in the child’s face, shaking the child’s head violently, forcing the child to perform-type military exercise, isolation, food deprivation, taunting, rebirthing, and humiliation.”
This is some scary stuff, particularly considering what happened to Candace Newmaker. The fact that Beth Thomas works with Nancy Thomas is also worrisome and perhaps suggests that Beth has never truly moved beyond her own intense childhood trauma and re-visits it — in a sense — each time she and Nancy Thomas engage in questionable therapeutic techniques with a client. But keep in mind, I am only speculating and I invite you to do the same.
8 Responses to “Children of Rage”: The Strange Case of RAD Victim Beth Thomas and Her Re-Birthing Benefactor Connell Watkins
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
SITES WE LIKE
usindiebooksblog
Suzanne Jenkins
True Crime Historian
philipsmith.eu
Peter Prasad's Goodreads Blog
Crookstube
Hard Case Crime
True Crime Report
3: AM Magazine
The Weekly Lizard
The Young Turks
The Glasgow Curse
John Nardizzi, Author
Thomas Davidson, Author
Pitchforks
Court Junkie.Com
Mike Roche, Author
Darcia Helle, Author
Darcia Helle, Author's Blog
The Trouble with Justice
Crimified
Paul Anthony
Ann Marie Ackermann's Author Website
RJ Parker True Crime Website
Serial Killer Calendar.com
ReadFREE.lyRecent Comments
- Crime story on Embracing the Other: You Can Make It If You Really Try
- Beth Mastyk Verneris on Murder Among the Asian Angels!
- Denise Williams on Karla Homolka Psychological Evaluation: Abuse Victim or Just Plain Evil?
- Kierra on Cracks in “The Iceman”: Richard Kuklinski, Serial Killer and Real-Life Mafia Hit Man
- Ebenezer on Prisoner in Agony Escapes from Jail to See Dentist, Then Turns Himself Back In
Archives
- July 2018
- March 2018
- September 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013












I find this practice to be really disturbing. What real qualifications do any of these women have? Just because Beth Thomas was a survivor of RAD does not qualify her, to work with children nor does it make her a licensed practitioner to use radical means to alter bad behavior in children. Because you have survived it does not make you an authority. I agree with you Patrick, perhaps Beth was never really “cured”, she just deflected her anger and detachment to other children. Very scary.
As a mother I would never let any of the people involved get within ten feet of my children!
Hi Diana, You’re right. This is a very disturbing case.
Wow, this article has left me speechless. We adopted a sibling group of 3 who had been severely neglected and abused. They were 2, 3 and 5. Back in 1993, we believed that all it took was Love. The Dept. of Social Services did not share much about their past history. Problems began immediately. Bedwetting, hoarding, stealing, lying, and one incident of incest which I caught. We all began different therapy modalities: Play, individual, group, family. I always felt that there just wasn’t any connection with the children because, especially the eldest, a girl, would not attach to me. She had already formed her attachment to her real mother. Eventually, the middle child (a boy) had to go to a residential treatment center after putting bleach in my drinking glass of water.
15 years forward: My daughter has reunited with her birth mother. She had two children, married the father, and then left the children when they were 2 and 3. It almost reminded me of her acting just like her biological mother. The two youngest children, boys, were in and out of prison (like their biological father) for non-violent felonies. With that behind now, the boys are trying to rebuilt their lives. We have always been there for them. I am close to the boys but not to my daughter. Finding their birth mother again was the worst thing that could have ever happened. The mother was exactly the same as when she lost custody. The bio father who served 9 years in prison for grand larceny, is now facing child sexual abuse charges of his own children with his recently divorced 2nd wife. I firmly believe my daughter was sexually abused by her biological father. The two eldest had diagnoses of Reactive Attachment Disorder; the youngest was diagnosed as Narcissistic. I don’t believe my children are a danger at all, however, they are very affected in forming lasting loving relationships and that may last their lifetime. I have a close relationship with my boys, but have had to use the “tough love” approach or they would have asked and expected everything from me without any effort on their part. Thank you for this forum.
It’s sounds like you’ve done a great job of being there for those poor neglected children.
Look up Reactive Attachment Disorder. It is characterized by either overly withdrawn or overly affectionate before and needs to be diagnosed before age 5. Beth was coached to admit to acts that weren’t proven during an interview with the late Ken Magid who lost his license for abusing children.
Nancy does not do any of those things in her attachment therapy. She believes that RAD kids should be enforced with love and they will gain love in their hearts. If you have never been to one of her Healing Hearts Camps and witnessed her work hands on, you have no idea what you are talking about. I realize his article is old, but I am just coming across it. Beth is now a fantastic nurse that works with children and has an amazing life. I hate to read articles with no factual evidence, only a passed along lie. I know for a fact that she does not approve of or practice rebirthing therapy.
When I heard the story of Beth I had a very hard time believing she had been cured of her sociopath. And reading this article reinforces this belief. She clearly is engaging in horrifying child abuse if what this article says is true and this is what is to be expected from a sociopath. But why, in God’s name, is it allowes.
I find the article disgusting. What is the phrase, “church people” for? The fact that they went to church or had faith means nothing. If they weren’t “church people”, would you describe them as “non church people”? Shows your hatred for people of faith.